Today brings the news that the infamous Twitter troll Liam Stacey will suffer pretty serious consequences as a result of his deplorable comments on the day that Bolton Wanderers midfielder Fabrice Muamba lay stricken on the pitch at White Hart Lane. Having first tweeted "LOL. Fuck Muamba he's dead !!! #Haha", he then got involved in slanging matches with people who reacted angrily. Along the way, his ensuing remarks included "go suck a nigger dick" and "go suck muamba's dead black dick". Such was the level of interest and indignation among the online public that this usually sleepy blog received almost 50,000 hits when first reporting on the Swansea student's horrible antics.
Young Mr. Stacey now has fifty-six days in jail ahead of him, during which he can reflect on the wisdom of sharing one's darker thoughts via a medium with the reach and immediacy of Twitter.
In its short life, this blog has offered readers the opportunity to glimpse into the disordered minds of some particularly aggressive individuals. Liam Stacey is just the most recent and is probably the most widely known. But each of them has gained some degree of infamy.
Very recently, we met Oliver Warren, a young man from Derby. Warren's reaction to the plight of Bolton's Fabrice Muamba was in some ways worse than Liam Stacey's. While Warren is innocent of the kind of racially aggravated public order offence for which Liam Stacey will now do time, his reaction to the angry remonstration of a female tweeter came in the form of a vile threat that was surely in breach of the Communications Act (2003).
Oliver Warren has since deleted the Twitter account from which this threat of genital mutilation was made. But of course he could now very easily be tweeting anonymously. As it stands, there is nothing in the public domain to suggest that he has been apprehended. Unlike Liam Stacey, Oliver Warren does not seem to be of interest to the mainstream media. Bartel Scheers writes at Lemonsblack, a blog that "is exploring and provoking the challenges for the digital world", with a focus "on how technology integrates with traditional life, media, art and culture blurring the line between the virtual and real worlds." In a piece on how some people have brought "crash and burn personal branding" upon themselves on social networks, Scheers notes that Warren has walked away untouched from his own stupidity. To date, unless any readers can offer examples, no other blogger - much less any mainstream media outlet - has paid any attention to Oliver Warren.
Perhaps we can take this to mean that while the media feel there will be public interest in racist slurs about a famous sportsman, a person threatening to stab a young woman in the vagina is a non-story, even if directly connected to the same incident which gained such massive coverage. The local newspapers in Derby have certainly been contacted regarding Mr. Warren. So far, there has been no response from these regional media outlets. But Warren is out there somewhere and even if the authorities and the newspapers decline to chase him down, it is perhaps to be hoped that the next person to whom he applies for a job will take the increasingly common precaution of checking out his digital footprint.
I'm just sat here in shock... it's just terrifying that people have these thoughts in their head and then feel its okay to say it to someone. What he said to Lucy was absolutely disgusting, I hope she is okay and that this catches up with Warren
ReplyDeletePeople should not be able to get away with things like this... just wrong
Lucy called him the C-word. I think she's disgusting. She's offended me with her use of the English language. Can we send her to prison too?
Deleteso sad to see others trying to justify this shitbag's comments and deploring his sentence on other forums today.
ReplyDeleteI've never participated in this type of forum before but living very close to where this load of shit comes from (and as he's part of Treorchy RFC who are role models for kids in my area) I am very glad that this type of cowardly and racist abuse has been singled out for what some might call "heavy handed" measures. I agree with freedom of speech but cannot accept that this is a slippery slope. How the hell is this "freedom of speech" he's not making any type of philosophical argument...he's just offensive and pointless and I cannot see why people are relating this to serious discussion about an individuals rights to express themselves. As far as the argument goes that "words can never hurt you".. may be so but they can influence others.
You do not believe in freedom of speech.
DeleteMorons. There is a slippery slope here. Don't you fools see that there is no incitement in any of this. No-one is saying 'go and do this' or 'go and kill such and such'. I don't care much for America, but at least they don't jail people for making banal statements that many people make on a daily basis. They, after all have a constitution.
ReplyDeleteRe: Freedom of speech.
ReplyDeleteIt should be just that. Complete freedom. Not speech which you pick and choose what people should say or not say.
This is the real world I'm afraid not gingerbread land, there are people out there who are vile and disgusting to your own personal sentimentalities.
There's nothing wrong with rallying against it with your own personal warcry but I'm afraid it's likely to not go away any time soon.
Loud mouthed idiots have been around pre-twitter, the only difference is that they have a digital world reaching megaphone now.
We all know why this guy got jailed - because of the cult of celebrity.
Judging by the celebrity tweets of 'ya boo sucks haha' that's going on at the 56 day sentencing it just feels like a tit-for-tat battle of celebrity vs public over social media. After all, celebrities are watched like hawks on it and the slightest misconstrued commentary becomes front page news due to lazy journo's who can't be bothered doing research anymore.
I think you need to learn to read and stop misrepresenting what was actually said. In other words, get off the hysterical bandwagon.
ReplyDeleteIt appears Warren reacted angrily to to Amos calling him the c-word.
You say he threatened her. No he didn't. He told her to shove a stanley knife up her blah blah blah. If he had threatened her, he would have specifically said that he would cause her physical harm. He didn't do that.
I can definitely see the word "ill" in there... as in "I'll shove a ..". Which is specifically saying he will cause her physical harm. You have some other interpretation of this?
Deleteread it again.
DeleteI read it and it definitely says ill. Which is representative of the words "i will" read it property please.
ReplyDelete